Continuity across entities
Teams coordinate care within defined entity, patient-record and access boundaries.
Medical Cities
Connect care across entities, departments and revenue while keeping record boundaries and access accountable.
Define entities, record boundaries and accountable access across the agreed network.
MANSOQ IN PRACTICE
Four complete operational cases. Read each one here.
END-TO-END WORKFLOW CASE
Teams coordinate care within defined entity, patient-record and access boundaries.
A patient moves between services in a medical-city network. The receiving entity needs the permitted care context while each organization retains its data boundaries.
Continuity across entities requires governed access, not unrestricted record sharing.
Agree the entities, identity scope and permitted record exchange for this composition.
Document the patient’s current encounter and reason for the next service.
Confirm the destination and responsible team for the referral or transfer.
Carry the agreed information through the selected connection with source references.
Review permitted information and document the receiving entity’s encounter and responsibilities.
Review supported network reporting within the agreed entity and access boundaries.
Entities · Identity boundary · Permissions
Each stage identifies the team, the action and the record carried forward.
Confirm the selected capabilities, required companions and external connections during configuration.
If an identity cannot be matched or access is outside the agreed boundary, the responsible teams resolve it before exchanging additional records.
Responsible team · Integration & IT teamResolve the patient mapping or access boundary with the source entity before additional records are shared.
Responsible team · Integration & IT teamUse the agreed operating fallback and identify the responsible source team. Review incomplete information explicitly rather than assuming it is current.
Responsible team · Integration & IT teamExternal systems, device connections, catalogue licenses and national exchanges are activated only within their agreed delivery scope. The professionals retain clinical decisions.
END-TO-END WORKFLOW CASE
The admitting team receives the documented emergency encounter and care responsibilities.
A medical-city outpatient service refers a patient for admission. The referral, receiving ward and financial encounter need connected responsibilities.
Changing the care setting should not remove the reason the patient arrived.
Record the outpatient assessment and documented admission referral.
Establish the destination service and the patient identity within the agreed network boundaries.
Connect the admission and ward responsibility to the receiving entity’s record.
Review available referral notes and record the receiving ward’s observations and responsibilities.
Document inpatient care and connect required department requests to the admitted encounter.
Retain the discharge context and review each entity’s recorded charges and account responsibility.
Outpatient encounter · Referral
Each stage identifies the team, the action and the record carried forward.
Confirm the selected capabilities, required companions and external connections during configuration.
When the destination changes, update the responsible entity and transfer record; cross-entity sharing still follows the agreed permissions.
Responsible team · Access & coordinationResolve the patient mapping or access boundary with the source entity before additional records are shared.
Responsible team · Integration & IT teamUse the agreed operating fallback and identify the responsible source team. Review incomplete information explicitly rather than assuming it is current.
Responsible team · Integration & IT teamExternal systems, device connections, catalogue licenses and national exchanges are activated only within their agreed delivery scope. The professionals retain clinical decisions.
END-TO-END WORKFLOW CASE
Specialist departments connect orders, available results and dispensing to the care record.
Several medical-city departments contribute to a patient’s care. The network needs to distinguish native operation from information exchanged with existing systems.
Connected results and operating a department are different responsibilities.
Agree which departments operate in MANSOQ and which retain an external system.
Link each requested service to the correct patient, encounter and department.
Document supported native activity or process the request in the retained source system.
Exchange the agreed results or status through the defined interface and identity mapping.
Review available department information and document the next care responsibility.
Review selected charge linkage with the service’s native or external source reference.
Department · Operating mode · Owner
Each stage identifies the team, the action and the record carried forward.
Confirm the selected capabilities, required companions and external connections during configuration.
If an interface fails, the agreed operational fallback and source owner handle the missing information; connected access does not replace departmental operation.
Responsible team · Integration & IT teamResolve the patient mapping or access boundary with the source entity before additional records are shared.
Responsible team · Integration & IT teamUse the agreed operating fallback and identify the responsible source team. Review incomplete information explicitly rather than assuming it is current.
Responsible team · Integration & IT teamExternal systems, device connections, catalogue licenses and national exchanges are activated only within their agreed delivery scope. The professionals retain clinical decisions.
END-TO-END WORKFLOW CASE
Leadership reviews selected operational and revenue reporting within governed boundaries.
Medical-city leaders review operational and revenue activity across selected entities. They need comparable views with a clear source and reporting boundary.
A network report is useful only when the included entities and definitions are clear.
Define the operational question, selected entities and authorized audience.
Record the relevant care and departmental activity within its source entity.
Review claims, financial responses and outstanding work within the selected reporting scope.
Check included sources, entity permissions and the agreed operational definitions.
Use supported operational and revenue views to identify work requiring attention.
Record the responsible team and return operational questions to the relevant source.
Question · Entities · Access
Each stage identifies the team, the action and the record carried forward.
Confirm the selected capabilities, required companions and external connections during configuration.
An incomplete source is identified in the review rather than silently treated as zero activity; the source owner resolves the reporting gap.
Responsible team · Service leadershipResolve the patient mapping or access boundary with the source entity before additional records are shared.
Responsible team · Integration & IT teamUse the agreed operating fallback and identify the responsible source team. Review incomplete information explicitly rather than assuming it is current.
Responsible team · Integration & IT teamExternal systems, device connections, catalogue licenses and national exchanges are activated only within their agreed delivery scope. The professionals retain clinical decisions.
Your solution is already selected. Adjust the services and review your proposal.
Network governance: Define entities, record boundaries and accountable access across the agreed network. Care across settings: Connect outpatient, emergency and inpatient context in the network composition. Shared specialist work: Connect laboratory work, medication and departmental supply responsibilities. Connected systems: Agree the systems, interfaces and data exchanged across entities. Revenue operations: Connect clinical activity, payer follow-up and reconciliation within entity boundaries. Leadership insight: Review selected operational and revenue reports with clear source context.
Explore the detailsContinuity across entities: A patient moves between services in a medical-city network. The receiving entity needs the permitted care context while each organization retains its data boundaries. Emergency into inpatient care: A medical-city outpatient service refers a patient for admission. The referral, receiving ward and financial encounter need connected responsibilities. Diagnostics and medication across teams: Several medical-city departments contribute to a patient’s care. The network needs to distinguish native operation from information exchanged with existing systems. A leadership view grounded in source data: Medical-city leaders review operational and revenue activity across selected entities. They need comparable views with a clear source and reporting boundary.
Explore the detailsChoose this care setting in the package builder, review included and optional products, then confirm implementation, interfaces and operating scope. Published care packages have no automatic trial; a demonstration or evaluation is arranged on request. Published workflow cases are illustrative; they do not claim named customer outcomes.
Explore the details